Archive

Posts Tagged ‘About’

THE LEGAL CONSULTATION 4 the litigation & i’m thinking about ass, ’cause i feel Great!

January 27th, 2012 No comments

IT COST ME TOO MUCH NOT TO BUST YOUR BLACK ASSES & TEACH ALL OF YOU A LESSON FOR LIFE AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THIS ACTION PLAN AND LEGAL STRATEGY: 1. INVESTIGATIONS – CHECK, GOT ALL I CNA GET NOW THAT WE GOT TAYTAY1146 AS THE GRAND-DAUGHTER OF NYS SENATOR SHIRLEY L. HUNTLEY. 2. CIVIL LITIGATION WITH OWN FUNDS 450+ PAGE BRIEF TO 14 ENTITIES & PEOPLE WHOM ARE: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS __________________________________x PHILIPPE EDOUARD DRICE, Index No. Plaintiff, -against- VERIFIED COMPLAINT Queens District Attorney RICHARD A. BROWN, NYPD, NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, JOHN B. RHEA, NYCHA TENANT ASSOCIATION, NEVA HARPER, HOLSIA MITCHEL, NEW YORK CITY HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, NEW YORK CITY ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, CREEDMOOR PSYCHIATRIC LEGAL SERVICES, JAMIE BUTCHIN, GREGORY W. MEEKS, IDA M.SMITH, KIM FULLER, SHIRLEY L. HUNTLEY, LESTER MUSE, MALCOLM A. SMITH, VIVIAN E. COOK, LEROY COMRIE, RANCE HUFF MARIA RESSOS, BILL THOMPSON SOUTHEAST QUEENS PRESS, DOMINIC RAFTER AND DONNA FUREY, ARE THE Defendant(s) I SAID EVERY ONE WHO HAD A HAND IN THE HONEY DEW BUCKET OFTHE DESTRUCTION OF MY LIFE SHALL BE MADE OT ANSWER; SO HELP ME GOD! I BELEIVE ATTHE END OF THE PROCESS OF WHY TO HOW WE CAN COME TO A REASONABLE CONCLUSION OF THE INITIAL ALLEGATIONS THAT NYCHA, HRA & APS ARE CONDUCTING A FORM OF REDLINING WHICH IS A FINGER POINTING LOUDLY AT MAYRO BLOOMBERG MISUSING HIS COMMISSIONER TO CIRCUMVENT FEDERAL LAWS BY GETTING THESE MINORITY
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Free information about people — government records

November 23rd, 2010 6 comments

how to i go about finding my County birth certificate?

I have a hospital birth certificate, but i need the Original county birth certificate to apply for a passport.i want to get a passport so, i can go with my friend to Romania next year. i’m really worried that if i don’t apply soon it will be longer for it to arrive.I was born in arcadia, California. i would like to just order it online.i know my parents won’t drive all the way out there to los angeles just to pick up a slip of paper! how to i go about finding my birth certificate?is there an address of public records in which i go to retrieve it, or government website that i can order it on?

The Truth About Bankruptcy

 

As more and more Americans fall victim to rising bills and a slowing economy, a good number of ordinary citizens have been forced to investigate bankruptcy as a final solution to mounting debt-loads. Nearly two million of us went bankrupt last year and the number continues to climb. For consumers who’ve never before fallen behind in their payments, too many simply lose hope and, after the first call from a collection agency, blindly reach out for bankruptcy protection without learning much about the program. In reality, modern bankruptcies aren’t nearly as easy as people have been led to believe, and the consequence for credit report and families’ financial stability can often be disastrous. Furthermore, several alternatives to bankruptcy have emerged in recent years that, for the average borrowers, could make a good deal more sense. Bankruptcy’s certainly more widely discussed and may seem more convenient, but the repercussions of bankruptcy can be truly severe and, for a wide swath of borrowers, the program may not even be available. In this article, we hope to explain the bankruptcy process and illuminate some of the lesser-known pit-falls. For the genuinely desperate, bankruptcy protection may indeed be their last option, but, for the majority of consumers, it’s something to be avoided at all costs even for the few that qualify.

 

Some form of governmentally-sanctioned bankruptcy protection has been in existence for hundreds of years. Of course, until recently, the drawbacks were rather more severe – debtor’s prisons, thumbs branded with ‘T’ for thief, ears nailed to pillories (and, in Greek and Roman times, slavery). The term itself comes from the Italian banca rotta or broken bench and neatly signifies the often humiliating stigma of helpless debt-loads. It wasn’t until the late nineteenth century that the United States government first implemented legislation meant to help the borrower who, by means not of his control, had fallen behind on payments, and the first laws instituting bankruptcy as we now know it only came into being just over a hundred years ago.

 

Essentially, bankruptcy protection is intended to assist individuals and corporations in liquidating or re-structuring their debts under the oversight of court-mandated trustees. A number of different statutes and accompanying federal bankruptcy divisions have been erected over the years concerning various types of debtors. Chapter 11, the third most common bankruptcy, is intended for businesses to re-organize while maintaining control of their enterprise (and, perhaps, agreeing to repay funds owed through future earnings). Chapter 9, famously used by Orange County several years ago, extends protection to municipalities and governmental utilities. Chapter 12 is solely intended for family farms and fishermen while Chapter 15 is meant for foreign corporations doing business on American soil. In this article, we’ll just take a look at the bankruptcy options overwhelmingly used by individual consumers: Chapter 7 and Chapter 13.

 

Chapter 7 protection’s what most people think of when they hear the term bankruptcy. Under certain circumstances, Chapter 7 protection will eliminate most unsecured (leaving aside those loans pegged upon collateral that could be repossessed or foreclosed upon; vehicles and homes, most commonly) debts. Child and spousal support, recent tax liens, fines or penalties assessed from criminal actions, or most student loans would not be dischargeable under current law. 2005 legislation made it considerably more difficult for average borrowers to qualify for Chapter 7 protection. Applicants are now subjected to the so-called ‘means test’ which compares all filers’ incomes and living expenses to an arbitrarily defined state average in order to determine their degree of need, and, should income be too high or expenses too low, the court would instead switch those seeking to declare toward Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

 

A Chapter 13 bankruptcy isn’t that different from the corporate re-organization plan, really, except it’s dramatically harder for families to follow strict and governmentally-created budgets. Essentially, a trustee will determine what each filer’s income should be (based upon one past stretch and ignoring changes of employment or seasonally-based work) and what expenses are needed (often forcing relocation and pulling children from private schools, for example). Using the same criteria as Chapter 7, up to fifty percent of that debt-load may be eliminated, but the remainder’s lumped together in a payment plan with monthly minimums often higher than the borrower was currently paying (or, as often the case, not paying) with severe repercussions should even a single month’s payment not arrive.

 

In both cases, filers can expect their unsecured debts to be lessened if not entirely liquidated, but there are more serious disadvantages that aren’t mentioned as often. First of all, absolutely nothing’s as damaging to the borrower’s credit report or FICO score . A bankruptcy will remain on a credit report for up to a decade and in court documents for twenty years. Any future financial transactions will be severely curtailed. Continuing education, home loans (even rentals), even many potential employment opportunities may be near impossible with a bankruptcy on one’s record. Security clearances or personal insurance will often be denied. And, if it needs mentioning, there’s an understandable social stigma surrounding bankruptcy. It’s considered the final option for a very good reason.

 

Beyond the ruinous effects upon credit and eventual life plans, though, there are the practical drawbacks immediately discernable. With Chapter 7 protection, the newly bankrupt have always faced the threat of property being seized by the government and auctioned for sale with proceeds going to repay creditors, but, in the past, such property was valued purely be re-sale amounts. Under the 2005 legislation, however, all property’s to be valued with regard to replacement costs. Obviously, this makes any total much higher and greatly increases the chance all possessions (including household goods, family heirlooms, toy and hobby equipment, even clothes) could wind up on the auction block. Would elimination of debts be worth the elimination of a life’s collected possessions?

 

With Chapter 13 bankruptcy, on the other hand, there’s the necessity of submitting the next five years’ existence to federal guidelines and the whims of a court-appointed trustee. Everything depends upon state averages and an arbitrarily-set list of day-to-day needs. Should your child require special schooling or your line of work require a certain type of vehicle (or, simply, should you live in an area of the state with considerably higher rents), none of this would matter. Remember: these new statues were implemented solely to make it less advantageous for the average consumer to declare bankruptcy. And few things could be less desirable than a life lived under IRS statistical dominion.

 

Leaving aside the popular myth of bankruptcy offering a fresh start (even though, as we’ve shown, most debts aren’t even dischargeable under the current legislation), black-marks against credit reports last up to a decade. There’s a common misconception that, in Chapter 13 bankruptcies, debtors can choose certain credit lines to maintain. Upon threat of imprisonment, though, every single account must be included within the bankruptcy. .If borrowers are somehow able to manage credit card companies or mortgage lenders to again trust them, the interest rates would be sky-high. The very procedure of filing for bankruptcy, even with the well-paid assistance of bankruptcy attorneys – whose importance, as laws grow more complex, cannot be underestimated – has become an incredibly laborious undertaking; almost a second job even before considering the mandated (and borrower funded) debt management classes each filer must complete before discharge.

 

As unemployment worsens, credit cards become more available to all sorts of borrowers, and (a rarely-discussed but important reason for the rapid increase of filings) the rate of divorce spirals, it’s easy to see why so many Americans still feel the need to declare bankruptcy, but other alternatives do exist. The debt settlement programs combine much of what’s enticing about bankruptcy protection with safeguards against garnished wages or loss of property – and relatively minor credit repercussions compared to the FICO score carnage Chapters 7 and 13 may inflict. Essentially, negotiation professionals talk to each creditor on behalf of the debtor and, in exchange for an easily navigable monthly installment plan, attempt to reduce the overall debt-load toward something more manageable. The creditors themselves, reasonably, worry that persecuted borrowers may attempt a Chapter 7 as a last-ditch solution, and, however unlikely total liquidation of debt this current climate, they still would prefer not to risk the chance. Furthermore, the legal costs too often outweigh the debts they actually collect – and, once accounts go to collection agencies, those rare funds tracked down amount to pennies on the dollar.

 

For all concerned, it’s a better idea to work out some sort of mutually-beneficial arrangement. Depending on each borrower’s specific financial portfolio or debt-load, the debt settlement professional lowers both payments and balance in amounts exceeding forty percent. Credit reports take a hit, of course, but the effect upon FICO scores is nowhere near as extreme as what happens after a bankruptcy. Borrowers that have successfully followed the debt settlement program may regain top credit scores in only a matter of years. Beyond which, there’s no threat of governmentally-sanctioned budgeting or seized possession – and existing bill collectors must contact the borrowers’ debt settlement officer when attempting to collect monies owed.

 

Obviously, as with any serious financial issue, one should always consult professionals in the industry before making a final decision. There are more and more debt settlement counselors every day, as the economy continues to worsen and ordinary borrowers begin to understand (especially in light of recent legislative restrictions) the different alternatives available, and it only takes a moment for the professional to analyze a debtor’s credit report and offer advice as to the best option. Certainly, there’s a wide collective of Americans with debts no honest man could pay, and bankruptcy protection’s still needed to help the truly unfortunate. For most of us, though, the negative connotations of bankruptcy, particularly now, far outweigh the chance of debt liquidation. It’s best to investigate all possible scenarios, but the days of guilt-free debt liquidation are over.

What do you think about this?

I go to this school, and im white, i have a teacher, and she will hate us and purposely lose our stuff so she cand give the white kids and F. the just ticked me off, tell me what you think…………..

Racism Rampant at Alabama School……The parents of several black junior high school students have filed a discrimination lawsuit claiming their children are subject to racial slurs and punished more harshly than white students at Monroeville Junior High School.

The lawsuit says black students at the county’s only public junior high have been called slurs such as the “N-word,” “filthy trash” and “black monkey.” Their parents also say classes are segregated, with most black students being kept out of advanced placement and honors courses.

The action, originally filed in August, was revived this week by the American Civil Liberties Union in U.S. Southern District Court on behalf of nine students. It names the Monroe County Board of Education, Monroeville Junior High principal Lana Wilson, county superintendent Dennis Mixon, and the five-member school board.

“I just feel like every student should have the right to a decent education regardless of race, creed or color,” said Tangelia Yates, a parent involved in the lawsuit whose son is an eighth grader. “We need to make sure that that happens within the Alabama school system, particularly Monroe County.”

Monroeville, more than 80 miles southwest of Montgomery, is the hometown of “To Kill a Mockingbird” author Harper Lee, whose coming-of-age tale discusses racism and injustice in a small Alabama town in the 1930s.

The carefully restored Old Courthouse, which was built in 1903, draws sold-out crowds to its auditorium each spring for a two-act adaptation of Lee’s novel. The courthouse draws tourists who have fallen in love with the Pulitzer Prize-winning book, which looks at racism through the eyes of a tenacious tomboy named Scout.

Everette Price, an attorney in nearby Brewton, has directed the “Mockingbird Players” in their springtime productions since 1994 and said it’s easy to see why such allegations would be considered more egregious in a city with Monroeville’s history.
It’s going to catch somebody’s eyes faster in Monroeville than say if somebody made the same allegations in Brewton,” Price said Friday.

The junior high school at the center of the lawsuit has 463 students from grades 6-8 and its population is 78 percent black and 22 percent white.

The parents say black students who got into fights with white students were given off-campus suspensions for longer periods of time while white students were given shorter in-school suspensions. They also said black students were disciplined for minor dress code violations like untucked shirts and for violations that weren’t even in the code, such as loose or missing buttons.

The lawsuit also describes an incident in which a student was being teased by white classmates who called her a “black monkey.” The student told the white teacher, who responded by saying “sit back down because you do look like a black monkey,” the suit claims.

Students whose parents complained about the treatment were targeted for harsher punishment as a result, said Catherine Kim, an attorney for the ACLU’s Racial Justice Project.

“There are policies and practices that serve to criminalize youth and push them out of classes – primarily children of color,” Kim said.

Monroe County School system attorney Mark Boardman said the lawsuit’s allegations were investigated and found to be “baseless.” A review of discipline records showed no disciplinary disparity between races, he said, and the district is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed.

“Three other lawyers have been involved in this case and decided – after learning the facts – not to take it,” Boardman said.

Yates said her son’s self-esteem has declined since he enrolled there as a sixth grader. Yates said she asked to attend her son’s classes after he began having trouble and saw a black teacher telling students they were “lazy and slow.”

The same teacher also gave her son an ‘F’ on a project in which students were to design a futuristic pair of pants. The teacher told Yates’ son his project “looks like something a slave would wear,” the mother said.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers